March 2007  Vol. 4 No. 3



 

 

 


 

I have it on good authority that spring will arrive soon in Indiana because the robins have returned!  I hope that's true....We recently returned from a quick trip to Dallas, where our son graduated from the Dallas Police Academy.  I was most impressed, not only by my son's accomplishments, but also by the thoroughness and rigor of the training he went through.  Thanks to all of our friends who have wished him well as he went through the Academy!

 

The Helm Report:  Tools, Tips, & Techniques for avoiding hiring mistakes and developing people

 

Published on the second Thursday of each month

Barbara Otto, Editor (mail to mailto:botto@helmtest.com

 

Visit us online at http://www.helmtest.com/

 

Word count for this issue – 1002

Approximate time to read =     9 minutes

 

This Month:  HOW TO SPOT A THIEF BEFORE YOU HIRE HIM

 

This month’s topic was inspired by an email I received last week:

 

“Kurt,

You’re not going to believe this, because I can’t believe it!  Yesterday I caught (name), my chief financial officer, red-handed, stealing from the company.  He is (was) one of my best people and, I thought, a good friend.  He’s married to a wonderful woman, has two great kids and is active and well known in the community.  When I confronted him, he could give no good reason for what he did.  So, I have two questions.  First, did I miss something when I hired him?  If so, what was it?  And, second, how do I keep this from happening ever again?

Fred (not his real name)”

 

Well, as the man said, I have some good news and some bad news.

 

First, The Bad News

 

There is no 100% accurate way to predict whether someone will steal before you hire him or her.  Law enforcement experts and research in this area tell us that the tendency to commit the criminal act of stealing depends on two things:  motivation to steal, and a tempting opportunity.  Let’s look at what each of these entail.

 

Necessary Condition #1:  Motivation To Steal

 

An employee’s motivation to steal from his or her employer requires that the person feels a need to steal and that he or she finds a justification for that need.  The justification for stealing is important because, without it, the need to steal may not be acted on.  For example, $80,000 in credit card debt and a record of late payments on the account could create a strong need to reduce the debt.  However, justification is required in order to move the person from simply worrying about the debt to doing something illegal to reduce it. 

 

How can you get inside an applicant’s head to learn about his or her motivation?  Unless you happen to be telepathic, you can’t.  What you can do, however, is check the Work Attitude Questionnaire Report for the presence of any one of these six common justifications for stealing:

 

The Unexceptional Justification.  This is also known as the “everyone else does it” justification.  The person reasons, “If everyone else does it, then it is all right for me to do it, too.”

 

The Retribution Justification.  If the person feels that he or she was treated badly by the company, then this perceived mistreatment may justify stealing, in the individual’s mind, to atone for it.

 

The Evil Organization Justification.  If the person feels the company is engaged in illegal or immoral practices, then stealing can be seen as a way of punishing the company.

 

The Compensatory Justification.  If the person feels that the stolen items will be covered by the company’s insurance, then stealing “hurts no one” and may be seen as acceptable.

 

The Magnitude Justification.  If the items or money are of small enough value, in the thief’s view, then he or she may feel that taking them is not actually stealing.

 

The “Good Reason” Justification.  If the person has some other “really good reason” for doing so, he or she may feel justified in taking the money or goods, possibly even with the intention of repaying (someday.)

 

It is a red flag if you see a question(s) reported on the Work Attitude Questionnaire Report that suggests the presence of any of the above justifications.

           

Necessary Condition #2: A Tempting Opportunity

 

The second condition that sets the stage for employee theft is the presence of a tempting opportunity – that is, access to money or goods of some value.  How tempting such an opportunity is depends on the possibility of getting caught, and the severity of punishment if caught.  If a person feels a strong financial need and he has access to company money or goods, with circumstances such that the person feels he can get away with stealing and that, even if he is caught, the consequences/punishment will be mild, then the odds go up that he will steal.

 

Now, The Good News!

 

The best defenses against employee theft start with awareness on your part, and always include vigilance.  Begin by being aware at all times of the two conditions that set up the possibility of employee theft (motivation and opportunity), and then design policies and procedures that you follow consistently to subvert one or both of those conditions.  Let’s look at some specific recommendations:

 

In the Pre-Employment Process:

 

1.   Do a background check.

Red flags in the background check include significant debt and/or a criminal record.

 

2.   Do a drug test.

Positive results indicating drug use may indicate the need to steal to maintain a drug habit.

 

3.   Review the Work Attitude Questionnaire Report.

Moderate or High Risk results in either the Employee Theft category or the Drug Use category could be red flags that suggest a tendency on the individual’s part to find justifications for stealing.

 

Corporate Policy:

 

1.  Do everything in your power to make it difficult for employees to steal.  Keep tempting opportunities to a minimum by doing regular inventories, limiting the amount of petty cash on hand, and maintaining good internal bookkeeping and auditing practices.

 

2.  Make sure controls are in place to insure that if anyone tries to steal, he or she will be caught.  Address the issue of employee theft in the Employee Handbook, and define as fully and completely as you can what behavior qualifies as employee theft, and what the consequences, both corporate and legal, will be.

 

3.  Make the consequences of employee theft commensurate with the crime.  A slap on the wrist and a warning that next time the punishment will be more severe may be sufficient for minor infractions.  Anything beyond minor infractions may warrant more severe consequences, depending on the size of the theft.

 

Taking these steps still doesn’t guarantee that you will never experience a loss, but doing due diligence with applicants, clarifying the issue of employee theft, and reducing temptation will help keep your honest people honest.

 

Remember, People are not your most important asset!

          The RIGHT People are!

To hire the best, test!

            To reveal management potential, test!

To diagnose problem behavior, test!

 

Best regards,

kurtsignature

Kurt G. Helm, Ph.D.

 

Phone Toll Free 800-886-4356

Email:   khelm@helmtest.com

Website:     http://www.helmtest.com/

 

PRIVACY and SPAM POLICY:  We never rent, trade, or sell our email list to anyone for any reason whatsoever.  You'll never get an unsolicited email from a stranger as a result of joining this list.

 

© 2007, Kurt G. Helm, Ph.D.  All rights reserved.  You are allowed to use material from this newsletter in whole or in part provided that you include attribution in the following form:  “By Kurt G. Helm, Ph.D., of Helm and Associates, Inc.  Please visit our website at http://www.helmtest.com/ for more information about how to avoid hiring mistakes by using pre-employment testing as part of the applicant evaluation procedure.”