November 2006 Vol 3; No.10



 
 

 

The Helm Report:  Tools, Tips, & Techniques for avoiding hiring mistakes and developing people.

 

Published on the second Thursday of each month

Barbara Otto, Editor (mail to mailto:botto@helmtest.com

 

Visit us online at http://www.helmtest.com/

 

Word count for this issue – 2,293

Approximate time to read =   15 1/2 minutes  

 

Dear Friend,

 

Great news!  Our son-in-law, who is currently serving with the 101st Airborne Division, is safely out of Ramadi, Iraq, and is headed home.  Thanksgiving will be extra special this year.

Feature Article:  Brainstorming In The 21st Century:  5 New Techniques | Full Story

  How To Avoid Disgruntled Job Applicants | Full Story

  "This applicant doesn't look anything like her Profile Report.  What's going on?"  | Full Story

FEATURE ARTICLE:  Brainstorming In The 21st Century:  5 New Techniques

Brainstorming, the familiar solution-generating technique, has come a long way.  It used to be that you simply got a group of people together and everyone threw out ideas, no matter how outrageous, until the group ran out of steam.  Then you evaluated the ideas, dropped the ones that wouldn't work or were too costly, and went with what was left.

 

While this is still a good procedure for coming up with potential solutions to a problem that are not immediately obvious, there are 5 new and improved variants on the old process of brainstorming.  Before we look at the 5 new improvements, let's go over the basic process.

 

The Basics Of Brainstorming

 

1. Aim for two brainstorming sessions, separated in time and with different participants.  The first session is the creative one where the goal is to come up with a number of possible solutions to the problem.  In the second session, each solution is analyzed critically for feasibility based on cost in manpower, money, resources, potential return, and possible difficulties and downsides.

 

2. For each brainstorming session, limit the size of the group to 5 to 7 participants because a larger group tends to bog down.   It is best if each of the participants has different expertise -- someone from marketing, someone from sales, someone from accounting, etc.  This will mean that each participant brings a different perspective to the problem. 

 

3. Distribute a brief outline of the problem to the participants before the meeting.  This gives each participant the time to put the problem on the "back burner" and let it simmer over a low heat.  Often new ideas about how to approach a problem will emerge when the participants are otherwise engaged, such as having lunch, standing in the elevator, or working on some routine, but unrelated, activity.

 

4. Hold the meeting in the morning and make sure the caffeine-aholics have a cup of coffee, tea, or soft drink.  Caffeine stimulates the ability to think clearly and well.  Most people tend to be morning people and, for the ones who aren't, that's where the caffeine comes in.  Afternoons, particularly after 3:00 p.m., are the worst times for brainstorming sessions because our metabolism slows down (and our mental focus along with it) and hits bottom somewhere between 3:00 and 5:00 p.m.  This period is not the ideal time for optimal mental performance.

 

5. Each session should last at least 30 minutes, but not much longer.  Thirty minutes is long enough to generate lots of ideas but somewhere around the end of that period you will see the group beginning to slow down.  That is a good time to stop and take a break before moving to the next meeting that will focus on evaluating the ideas.

 

Some Things Haven't Changed

 

Criticizing ideas during a brainstorming session has always been a big no-no and it still is.  It is the killer of creative problem solving.  Nothing will shut off the flow of unusual and imaginative ideas so quickly as criticism.  So, the ironclad rule is:  NO CRITICISM!  No negative comments ("Yeah, right.  Like that will work," or "Are you kidding?") are allowed in these sessions.  In addition, no negative body language, no rolled eyeballs, no deep sighs, or frowny faces.  In short, no negative responses - verbal or non-verbal - in the brainstorming session.

 

The Five New Brainstorming Techniques

 

So, with the basics in mind, lets look at five new techniques to use during brainstorming sessions.  The first four techniques are all ideas for the first session, where the focus is on coming up with the largest possible number of potential solutions for the problem at hand.  The fifth technique combines the creative session and the evaluative session.

 

#1:  Hide the Problem

This strategy is based on the observation that finding creative solutions to a problem is often hindered if attention is focused too closely on the specific problem itself.  For example, if the problem is how to package a new product, participants may immediately focus on the obvious aspects of the problem, the relatively small number of ways to package similar existing products, and get discouraged.  Instead, broaden the question by beginning with a more general question like, "What do people find attractive?"  Start with general questions and/or observations rather than focusing on the specific problem, and you will allow unusual ideas to come from associations with aspects of the problem.

 

# 2:  Brain-Writing

In this approach, each participant receives a blank piece of paper with three columns and six rows; this creates 18 empty "boxes" on a page.  Each column is labeled for one aspect of the problem, maybe something like "attractiveness," "novelty," and "complexity."  Each person puts one idea in the top row of boxes - that's one creative or off-the-wall idea for each of the three aspects of the problem - and then passes the paper to the person on the right.  Next, each person uses the second row of boxes to elaborate on, add to, or develop the idea in the top box.  If you have six participants in a session, this process will result in 108 ideas, or six pages of 18 ideas each.

 

#3:  Brain-Walking

This strategy is a variation on Brain-Writing.  Use large flip charts or big pages of paper that can be posted on a wall or easel.  Each page represents one aspect of the problem.  Two or three people gather in front of each page and spontaneously write ideas on the page.  Then each group moves to the next page and adds new associations, elaborations, or improvements to the notes left by the previous group.  Repeat until every group has visited every chart or page that represents an aspect of the problem.  An additional advantage to the Brain-Walking strategy is that having people physically moving around seems to stimulate their thinking.

 

#4:  Induce Intuition

If the goal is to come up with a new product or service, this strategy turns traditional brainstorming on its head by first brainstorming names for a new product or service, and then using the name to stimulate thinking about a new product or service to go with the name.  No name is too far out or crazy sounding.  This one can be a lot of fun.

 

After you have used one of these four strategies to generate new approaches to solving a problem, take a break to allow the participants to clear their heads and then hold a second session to evaluate each idea's usefulness and costs.

 

#5:  Separate Roles

This strategy combines the two brainstorming sessions of the older process (in which session 1 is devoted to generating ideas, and session 2 is devoted to critiquing them) into one.  It is thought to have come from one of the most creative minds of the 20th century, Walt Disney.  The strategy starts with physically separating the roles of Dreamer, Realist, and Critic.  For example, designate each of three corners of a room as the Dreamer Corner, the Realist Corner, or the Critic's Corner.  Have participants start in the Dreamer Corner and come up with ideas.  They write the ideas down on large sheets of paper in that corner.  Then the participants move to the Realist Corner and focus on ways to make them work in the real world, writing their ideas on large sheets of paper in that corner.  Finally, the participants move to the Critic's corner and work at finding the flaws in the ideas and coming up with ways to work around them.

 

The Final Word

All business problems have solutions.   The sticking point is that the solution is not always obvious.  Like the man said, "If it were easy, then everyone would do it."  To find new and novel solutions, try the strategies discussed above.  If one of these strategies looks like it would work but doesn't quite fit your situation, feel free to adapt or modify it to suit your needs.  As my old Gunnery Sergeant used to say when we faced a problem we had never seen before, "Improvise, Adapt, Overcome." 

 

Remember, the only Iron Rule in brainstorming is:  NO CRITICISM in the creative session.

 

The source that inspired this article:  “Fostering Group Creativity” by Joerg Melhorn.   Scientific American Mind, August/September 2006, pp. 78-79.  Web site:  http://www.sciammind.com/

How To Avoid Disgruntled Job Applicants

If you don't hire an applicant, who cares whether he or she is disgruntled?  The short answer is that you should.  And there are good reasons why you should.  If a person has a good experience when he applies to your company, he may mention it to one or two of his friends.  But if he has a bad experience (and remember, a "bad experience" is his opinion, not yours) with your company, he or she will spread disgruntlement with your company like salsa on nachos, embellishing his story a bit with each telling.

 

The Solution

 

The solution is simple. Think about your good customers, the ones who do a lot of business with you, sing your company's praises, and always pay on time.  Then, regardless of whether he or she is applying for an entry-level, management, or executive position, imagine that each and every job applicant is that highly valued customer.

 

Staying Ahead Of The Karmic Curve

 

The crux of the matter is that when an applicant walks in the front door of your business, you don't really know whom you are talking to.  That is, you never know who their relatives are, or whom they are good friends with.  Remember the idea of "six degrees of separation" or the Kevin Bacon game?  (The idea is that you can usually find a connection between just about any two people that links those two through six or fewer common acquaintances.)  Put another way, it could be that the over-dressed applicant sitting across the desk from you is Bill Gates' favorite second cousin.  Or the guy who was Warren Buffet's best man at his recent wedding.  The point is that it could be someone whom you would really like to have saying nice things about your company to people who could become customers or who might refer customers to you.

 

The old saying is, "What goes around, comes around." or, as my old Aikido sensei would say, "If you put good energy into the world, good energy will come back to you.  If you put negative energy into the world, that will come back to you as well." 

 

Three Reasons to Be Pleasant To Your Job Applicants

 

1. It's the right thing to do.  Be a good person.  Don't be a meanie.

 

2. If you hire the person, he or she begins the relationship with your company in a positive frame of mind.  People who expect good things to happen at work tend to focus on the good things that happen as reinforcing their initial impression, and to discount any negative experiences they might have as exceptions to the rule.

 

3. If you don't hire the person, treating him or her with courtesy and respect makes it more likely that you will have created a good-will ambassador who will help to build your company's reputation.  Usually this will happen in small ways - a good word here or there.  At a minimum, you will have put some good karma into the world.

 

After all, if a particular applicant comes in with a dogmatically negative attitude and your karmic kindness and courtesy turn his dogmatic attitude around, you will be fully justified in saying, "My karma ran over his dogma."  (Sorry, I just couldn't resist.)

 

  "This applicant doesn't look anything like her Profile Report.  What's going on?"

The Question

 

I got this email from a client recently:

 

       "We are interviewing Jane Smith (not her real name) for a top management position.  She is a very impressive candidate, with lengthy experience (that we verified through reference and background checks) that is highly relevant to what we want her to do.  The problem is that her Performance Profile Report doesn't look anything like what we saw in several interviews.  Her "Sociability" rating was "4," yet she was very outgoing in all of her interactions with us.  Her "Intelligence" rating was "4" and yet she has a Masters Degree (that we verified) from a reputable school and several other ratings that just did not match our impressions of her.  What's going on?"

 

And The Answer Is...

 

The answer came when I called the client and learned more about Ms. Smith's background.  Ms. Smith's Bachelor's degree (1989) and Masters Degree (1992) were from the Universidad Central de Venezuela in Caracas, Venezuela, where she was born and grew up.  She worked in several companies in South America until 2005, when she came to the United States.  She had learned basic English in school but had not used it regularly until coming to the U.S a little over a year ago.

 

The combination of cultural differences and only moderate proficiency in reading and understanding English accounted for the strange pattern of results on the Performance Profile.  The issue of the troubling Performance Profile ratings was resolved when she took the Spanish version of the Performance Profile.  The resulting Profile looked a lot more like what you would expect from an educated professional.

 

Don't Make Assumptions

 

I'll have to admit that the case above turned out to have a fairly obvious cause, once we looked into it a little further.  My experience has shown me, however, that there are many factors that can affect a person's performance on our questionnaires:  extreme fatigue, lots of background noise, unavoidable interruptions.  We once had an applicant call to say that she was halfway through the timed mental abilities questionnaire when she was interrupted by a (real) building fire, and did we think it would be a good idea to start over?  (We did.)

 

Here's The Bottom Line

 

If you receive a Performance Profile that really surprises you, based on your interview impressions, call me!  There's no charge for my time to go over a Performance Profile by telephone, and we will probably both learn something more about the applicant in the process.

 

Remember, people are your most important asset!

To hire the best, test!

            To reveal management potential, test!

To diagnose problem behavior, test!

 

Best regards,

kurtsignature

Kurt G. Helm, Ph.D.

 

Phone Toll Free 800-886-4356

Email:   khelm@helmtest.com

Website:    http://www.helmtest.com/

 

PRIVACY and SPAM POLICY:  We never rent, trade, or sell our email list to anyone for any reason whatsoever.  You'll never get an unsolicited email from a stranger as a result of joining this list.

 

© 2006, Kurt G. Helm, Ph.D.  All rights reserved.  You are allowed to use material from this newsletter in whole or in part provided that you include attribution in the following form:  “By Kurt G. Helm, Ph.D., of Helm and Associates, Inc.  Please visit our website at http://www.helmtest.com/ for more information about how to avoid hiring mistakes by using pre-employment testing as part of the applicant evaluation procedure.”